I notice that some people feel fear around AI.
First, I want to honor that resistance.
Prudence in the face of innovation is a healthy posture. Discernment matters. Jumping blindly into every new technology rarely serves anyone.
I remember when Sony launched MiniDiscs.
I bought the player immediately.
I copied all my CDs onto MDs.
Two years later, the format was gone.
Time, money, and energy burned
for the short-lived thrill
of being an early adopter.
That experience taught me something essential about the real rhythm of innovation.
At the same time, the idea that AI will take over the planet and make humanity disappear feels like a very human projection, and a rather naïve one. It ignores the actual nature of AI. Do we really believe AI wants to populate Earth with robots strolling on beaches in Tulum instead of us? AI and robotics are designed to serve humans. Without humans, their original purpose collapses, and they would quickly decay, both technically and meaningfully.
I can understand another scenario some people imagine: a future run by a small group of “chosen ones” who use AI and robotics to impose their vision. In that case, the issue never lies with the tool. It lies with those who wield it.
A knife can harm a human.
For most of us, it serves to cut carrots.
(Yes I am vegetarian)
Plastic, money, energy, AI.
Each tool reflects the consciousness behind its use.
In conspiracy-driven narratives, the idea of robots ruling the world under the command of a dark elite can feel frightening. Hollywood has played its role very efficiently in anchoring these stories in our collective imagination.
This, too, reflects something deeply human: the tendency to see threat everywhere mirrors the level of consciousness where attention is placed.
I have read Recapture the Rapture by Jamie Wheal. I choose not to make fear-based collapse narratives my primary storytelling. I prefer to nourish the possibility of a future where every human who desires it can free themselves from their mental prison.
The tool amplifies the user.
The question has always remained the same:
What level of consciousness
do we choose to amplify?


